Since we’re in the deadest of dead times when it comes to college basketball, we figured now was as good a time as any to update some of our databases with 2008 figures. We like to do this for a couple of reasons: a) we’re incredibly stat nerdy, and if we don’t update our charts with new data in a reasonable amount of time after it becomes available, we begin suffering cold-sweat night terrors involving 39395 errors; and, b) like everyone else, we find it difficult to access this kind of historical data on the interwebs, and so this year we’ll be adding links to Google Docs to harbor all of our raw data.
Yes, Redheads Appreciate Robust Data
Our first task is to update our NBA Draft Picks by School information. You may recall that we put together several posts last summer detailing the historical statistics of the first two rounds of the NBA Draft from its inception as a round-robin spectacle in 1949. (See Draft Picks 1949-2006 by School, by Round and by Decade) Since not a lot of the data has changed in the interim, we’re going to take a different tack this time around. Rather than overwhelming you as we did last year with enormous data-filled tables, we’re going to break it down into smaller bite-size morsels first before giving you the full Monty. However, if you’re the type of person who can’t wait to dive headfirst into reams of data, be our guest. All of the raw data from the 1949-2008 NBA Drafts is here.
So here’s Table A, where we list the 11 programs with the most NBA Draft picks in history (1949-2008). For the full list of programs with ten or more historical draft picks, see our Google Doc on the subject.
It doesn’t take much brainpower to see that UCLA‘s Ben Howland and UNC‘s Roy Williams are likely to spend the next decade further dominating this list. Louisville and Kansas also stand to rise into the top five quickly with the players Rick Pitino and Bill Self are recruiting these days. Indiana, Duke, Kentucky – all have been trending downward, but how will the newish coaches at IU and UK change that, and will Coach K start recruiting studs again now that making the Sweet 16 is the norm at Duke? St. John’s and Maryland? Both are living on lost glory with no recent signs of improvement. And keep an eye on the sleeping giant Thad Matta is building at Ohio St. (currently at 25 total picks) – he could overtake the Terps with two more of his Thad Five-type classes.
Total draft picks are nice, but championships are won with first-round talent, and first-round talent tends to become first-round picks (just sayin’). So let’s slice the data a little further to see what schools produce the most first rounders (Table B).
The top six programs in history are also the top six producers of first round talent. Correlation, much? (ok, for that comment, forget Notre Dame and their zero F4s) We’re still aghast that Minnesota continues to appear in the top ten of this list. Something tells us that Tubby won’t exactly set the Twin Cities on fire with first rounders up there on the tundra.
How about elite players? It’s true that a good argument can be made that the NBA’s recent propensity in drafting potential over production has mitigated some of the value of analyzing these draft numbers at the college level, but there’s likely still a strong correlation between elite NBA draftees and collegiate team success. See Table C for the list of the schools with the most Top 10, Top 5 and #1 Overall Picks.
LSU is the real anomaly of this group – they’ve had a modicum of team success over the years (three F4s), but they seem to excel in producing top-tier individual talent, with eight Top 5 picks in history. Considering that LSU trails only UNC, UCLA and Duke in that category, it is phenomenal that the Tigers haven’t had more national success over the years (until we remember again… Dale Brown, John Brady). Did anyone else realize that Duquesne has had two #1 picks in its history, and that they were in consecutive years?!? Those Dick Ricketts (1955) and Sihugo Green (1956) teams of the mid-50s must have had P-town roiling, eh? (well, actually, the Dukes were NIT Champs in 1955).
Now we’re to Table D, which shows the breakdown of picks by decade. Keep in mind that the table is sorted by the 2000s column on the left – yes, we’re guilty of a serious case of presentism.
We threw this table up mostly to show that with one NBA Draft remaining this decade, several schools have a chance to take the lead for most picks in the 2000s. UCLA, Duke, Connecticut, Florida and Arizona could all have a couple more picks in the books by this time next year. UNC is the real wildcard, though. The Heels could have as many as five draftees in next year’s class, which would give them an outside shot at leading the decade, and is amazingly something that UNC has never done in its regal NBA Draft history.
Again, here is the link to the Google Docs listing the programs with 10+ draft picks in history, and here is the link to the comprehensive raw data where you can look up and manipulate the table to locate any pick from the last sixty years.
We have some further ideas for this data, but that’ll have to wait for another post.