2008 NBA Draft Profiles: Anthony Randolph
Posted by rtmsf on June 14th, 2008Over the next couple of weeks, we’re going to be rolling out our profiles of several of the top expected prospects in the 2008 NBA Draft. Figuring that we’re not the only ones who’ve thought of this, we decided to enlist some help by asking several of the best school-specific bloggers in the land to give us the up-close-and-personal profile of the players they’ve spent all year watching. For example, we probably only watched Anthony Randolph play 3 times this year because LSU was so terrible. These bloggers know these players – their strengths, their weaknesses, whether they become Black Mamba or channel C-Webb in the clutch, and what kind of team they would best fit with at the next level.
With that said, our next submission is from the pre-eminent LSU blog, And the Valley Shook. Richard over there brings an erudite and reasoned take on LSU sports (not to mention being prolific). Here is ATVS’s post on the mystery man (to most of us) and possibly overrated (?) Anthony Randolph.
Does Anyone Know Anything About This Kid? (photo credit: 2theadvocate.com)
Rush The Court asked me to give a draft preview of former LSU forward Anthony Randolph. I agreed to do it, but warned him that I wasn’t really a big fan of Randolph. He said that was fine, so here’s my preview. Keep in mind, I know next to nothing about the NBA, and while I am somewhat knowledgeable about college basketball, I don’t consider myself an expert. But I have watched Randolph quite a bit, and here’s what I see:
Strengths
- Tremendous basketball skill. He looks as fluid on the court as anyone you will see. For a tall man, he is quite confident with the ball in his hands. He is agile on the court and good around the rim. I don’t think he’s Magic Johnson or anything, but he clearly has the skill to be an NBA player.
- Very good length. He’s a tall, long-armed kid who can easily play above the rim and make it very difficult to shoot around him.
- Solid Athleticism. While he’s not a “jump out the gym” type like former Tiger Tyrus Thomas, he’s got good athleticism. He can run and jump a bit.
- Lack of Passion. A lot of commentators probably will list “lack of physical strength” as his biggest drawback, but having watched him quite a lot, it’s plain to me that even more serious of a concern is his lack of passion. He’s a guy who rarely seems concerned about winning or losing or how things are going on the court. He doesn’t seem to care very much about the team aspect of basketball. I really don’t think it’s a coincidence that his last two teams (the 2007-2008 LSU basketball team and his senior-year high school team) were both rather bad teams despite having a talent like him on it. If you think about it, of all the one-and-done players in college this year (Eric Gordon, OJ Mayo, Derrick Rose, Michael Beasley, etc.), which one played on the worst team? Answer: Anthony Randolph. Randolph was the only player talented enough to enter the NBA after high school who failed to elevate his college team to a national stage. I think that says something about Randolph. And yes, I know he had teammates, but so did Michael Beasley, and Beasley’s teammates weren’t very good either, but K-State had its best season in recent memory because of Beasley. LSU had Randolph and was still mediocre.
- Lack of Physical Strength. Now we get to the one that everyone mentions, and they mention it because it’s true. Randolph is just physically immature, even for his age, and he’ll be one of the youngest players in the draft. Randolph isn’t a good enough shooter or penetrator off the dribble to make his living outside the paint, and he isn’t strong enough (yet) to really compete with the bulked up NBA players. He’s a guy who makes his living with a quick first step near the goal and a slick move. He was frequently out-muscled by SEC competition, and the SEC isn’t even the best COLLEGE competition. Until he bulks up a little, the NBA post players will eat him alive. This means that whoever drafts him will have to wait a while to see him productive.
- Not a lot of basketball experience. This is self-explanatory. He’s young, and he’s only had one year of college coaching, and it was John Brady-coaching at that. He’s going to be a little behind the learning curve compared to the sophomores and juniors that make up the bulk of the draft, not to mention the experienced players who make up the bulk of the NBA.
- Doesn’t have star upside. He wasn’t even great in college. He was good. But he wasn’t great. He didn’t dominate the college competition. He’s neither a great shooter nor a great penetrator nor a great defender nor a great passer or playmaker. He’s decent at a lot of things, great at none. He can be a solid NBA player if he develops, but I don’t see All-Stars in his future.