Bubble Trouble: Volume II
Posted by Connor Pelton on February 11th, 2012In this weekly piece we will be comparing blind tournament résumés. Each week we will take three Pac-12 teams that are on the bubble and compare them to three national teams that are facing the same fate. Since the Pac-12 is in such a down year, we realize that we are going to run out of NCAA Tournament bubble teams pretty quickly. That’s why in the coming weeks you will see some NIT and even CBI bubble predictions. If you did not see last week’s post explaining everything, please go here.
*All numbers and rankings as of February 11
Team 1 | Team 2 |
Winning Percentage: .680 | Winning Percentage: .666 |
RPI: 63 | RPI: 58 |
SOS: 62 | SOS: 66 |
Quality Wins (Opponents’ RPI Rank): 47 | Quality Wins (Opponents’ RPI Rank): 28, 48 |
Bad Losses (Opponents’ RPI Rank): 106, 72, 75, 76 | Bad Losses (Opponents’ RPI Rank): 203, 82, 77 |
This is a very close battle. We’ll start by calling the winning percentages, RPI’s, and SOS’s even; There’s just not too big of a difference in any given category to give the edge to a specific team. Team two, however, edges out their counterpart in quality wins. I’m going to call the bad losses even, because even though team one has four of them to team two’s three, three of their four are all ranked in the seventies of the RPI. Team two has a 200-level loss in there, which is a big no-no on a résumé. I’m still taking team two to edge out team one, but I honestly wouldn’t feel good sending either of these teams to the Big Dance. Click the jump to see whom the résumés really belong to. Read the rest of this entry »