Freeze Frame: Tennessee’s Three-Point Defense
Posted by Brian Joyce on December 20th, 2011Tennessee lost 71-65 to a good College of Charleston team in Knoxville on December 14, but this loss was avoidable. The Volunteers looked lost on defense because of inconsistencies in effort and a lack of communication on perimeter screens. The Vols didn’t body up to Charleston’s shooters, allowing open looks all night. This is not a new problem for Cuonzo Martin’s club. Tennessee has allowed opposing guards to light it up all season long. In each of its losses this year, Tennessee has been unable to lock down the opposition’s star player:
- Duke: Seth Curry – 17 points, four assists
- Memphis: Will Barton – 25 points, one assist
- Oakland: Reggie Hamilton – 35 points, three assists
- Pittsburgh: Ashton Gibbs – 16 points, six assists
- Austin Peay: TyShwan Edmondson – 19 points, two assists
- College of Charleston: Antwaine Wiggins – 24 points, eight rebounds
College of Charleston came into this game making 34.9% of its three-point attempts. Against the Vols, the Cougars were 7-15 (46.7%). In this installment of Freeze Frame, we will examine UT’s inability to close out on good shooters, which allowed CofC to win this game.
Play 1 (17 minutes remaining in the first half)
Antwaine Wiggins is the Cougars’ most prolific scorer at 18.1 points per game. Cameron Tatum started out the game defending him, however, Tatum got tangled up on screens several times allowing Wiggins to get free. In the first play, Wiggins takes Tatum through two screens to find an open three point shot on the perimeter. Trent Weideman (#44) for CofC sets the first screen at the top of the key.