Maybe the Big East Really is Just Villanova and Everyone Else

Posted by Justin Kundrat on April 9th, 2019

It’s a painful narrative stemming from another painful season in the Big East. The conference as a whole battled all season long, collecting a number of impressive non-conference wins, amassing both longstanding and fleeting appearances in the Top 25, and ultimately achieving four NCAA Tournament bids. And yet again, come March, all that hard work failed to materialize. The best conference achievements might have been Xavier‘s run from 3-8 team to bubble team, the out-performance of Seton Hall and Creighton (picked eighth and ninth in the preseason poll, respectively), or DePaul‘s first postseason appearance since 2007 (it finished as the runner-up). But at the end of the day, the league’s attention disappeared as quickly as its several teams did from contention.

The Villanova East?

Given the exodus of talent from last offseason, most teams expected to struggle to adjust this year. But what hasn’t changed — not this year, last year, or the year before — is that the Big East continues to underwhelm in the NCAA Tournament. It’s a frustrating habit for conference supporters and it fuels the narratives that the league is no longer a top-tier conference, isn’t worth watching, is overrated, etc… So what gives? How many years will the non-Villanova Big East continue to languish in postseason play? And why is it even happening? There are a few schools of thought:

The first and most prominent is the sample size conundrum. The single elimination format of the NCAA Tournament allows for a wide variance in outcomes whereby a hot or cold shooting night, a few missed calls or a poor game plan will have an outsized effect on public perception of a team. The perfect example is last season’s Virginia club, which at 31-2 and an overall #1 seed, had one bad game at an inopportune time and received a shocking amount of criticism. Was it justified? Certainly not; a 33-game sample size greatly outweighs the one-game sample size of the NCAA Tournament. The same could be said for the postseason as it pertains to the Big East: single-game losses to equal or better teams should not outweigh the regular season as a barometer of success. But justly or not, it does, and it will continue to do so because the perceived point of the tournament in the first place is to crown the best team. One season might be a blip, but it remains perplexing that the Big East, aside from Villanova and an unexpected run by Xavier one year, has struggled for years.

The second potential reason is the caliber of the players, but this point is easily quashed. The conference continually brings in highly-touted recruits and transfers, and has had 16 players drafted into the NBA since its reconfiguration in 2013 (not to mention the numerous undrafted players who ended up on NBA rosters). The league might not be a breeding ground for one-and-done level players, but most of its players are talented enough to earn a roster spot on countless other high-major programs.

Another reason is the Big East’s pool of coaching talent. While the college basketball landscape is a revolving door when it comes to coaching positions, the Big East has experienced a net outflow in this department. John Thompson III’s success at Georgetown quickly went downhill after 2013; Chris Holtmann left Butler for Ohio State; Chris Mack left Xavier for Louisville, Buzz Williams left Marquette for Virginia Tech. These are quality coaches who left for brand-name schools and bigger salaries, leaving behind massive shoes to fill for fan bases that are used to winning. Unsurprisingly, all of these programs have struggled to achieve the same level of success (although it is too early to conclude on Travis Steele at Xavier). Other small-budget programs experience this all the time and recovery does not come quickly or easily.

There may be no particular reason, but the most logical guess is that the Big East’s problem is a mixture of all of the above. Some bad luck with small sample sizes; some untimely departures of high impact players; and numerous unproven head coaches attempting to build programs. But with another season in the books and the results largely unchanged, the frustration continues to mount. The only way to exorcise these demons is by winning in the postseason.

Justin Kundrat (175 Posts)

Villanova grad, patiently waiting another 10 years for season tickets. Follow Justin on twitter @JustinKundrat or email him at

Share this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *