Freeze Frame: Georgia’s Inability to Avoid Bad Twos

Posted by Brian Joyce on November 15th, 2016

Since Mark Fox’s arrival in Athens seven years ago, Georgia‘s calling card has not been made on the offensive end of the floor. Last season, the Bulldogs didn’t take care of the basketball (19.2% TO rate), weren’t particularly accurate from beyond the arc (36.8% 3FG), and weren’t the strongest offensive rebounding team (32.4% offensive rebounding rate) either. The most alarming statistic, though, was a dreadful 44.8 percent two-point conversion rate, a mark that ranked a horrendous 316th nationally. If Georgia is going to get back to the the NCAA Tournament like it did under Fox in 2015 and 2011, it will have to score more efficiently in large part by avoiding bad two-point jump shots.

Georgia's Mark Fox would love to see the Bulldogs attack the rim (The Athens Banner-Herald).

Georgia’s Mark Fox would love to see the Bulldogs attack the rim. (The Athens Banner-Herald)

Charles Mann is no longer in a Georgia uniform to get easy points at the free throw line, drawing 6.8 fouls per 40 minutes and scoring 43 percent of his points at the charity stripe. By comparison, backcourt mate J.J. Frazier, the Bulldogs’ primary ball-handler, scores just 27 percent of his points from the line. Where Mann’s game relied on attacking the hoop, Frazier is far more reliant on jumpers. If Georgia’s first couple of games this year are any indication, Fox hasn’t quite broken his point guard from the tendency to settle for too many mid-range jumpers. According to hoop-math.com, Georgia took 41.1 percent of its shots from mid-range last season (27.3% at the rim; 31.6% from three). To frame that number appropriately, the Bulldogs’ percentage of shots that came as two-point jumpers ranked ninth nationally. Conventional basketball wisdom says that long two-point jump shots are terribly inefficient, yet they are clearly a big part of Frazier’s offensive game.

J.J. Frazier's offensive profile.

J.J. Frazier’s offensive profile, according to hoop-math.com.

In the first game of the season against Clemson, Frazier shot just 5-of-13 from the field with three of those eight misses coming in the form of two-point jumpers.

JJ Frazier's shot chart against Clemson.

JJ Frazier’s shot chart against Clemson.

Frazier rebounded to shoot 5-of-10 last night against UNC-Asheville, but he still pulled up for several ill-advised mid-range shots. In the first frame below, Frazier drives against the 2-3 pressure zone.

Frazier drives the lane.

Frazier drives the lane.

He had two open options if he looked for the pass, but he instead opted for a running floater while getting swallowed up by three defenders in the middle of the zone. You can barely see Frazier in the below frame as he is surrounded by UNC-Asheville players.

There were two better options than this floater.

There were two better options than this floater.

Frazier worked the pick-and-roll option midway through the second half with Mike Edwards setting a good screen. He finds some daylight in the lane and again has two open teammates on the perimeter. He chooses instead to take a long, contested two-point jumper with defenders on both sides of him. Even though he made this shot, it is not the type of shot that will lead to greater efficiency in the long run.

Frazier takes a contested jumper.

Frazier takes a contested jumper (and makes it!).

If Georgia is going to show offensive improvement this year, Fox needs to shore up his players’ — especially Frazier’s — inefficient shot selection. The team’s offensive woes come in large part from taking way too many long range two-point jumpers. If the offense instead focuses on attacking the rim and looking for open perimeter shooters off the dribble, the Bulldogs will see their field goal percentage increase and their season win total along with it.

Brian Joyce (333 Posts)

Brian Joyce is an advanced metrics enthusiast, college hoops junkie, and writer for the SEC basketball microsite for Rush the Court.


Share this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *