Washington: Why Don’t We Trust the Huskies?
Posted by Andrew Murawa on December 9th, 2014With it’s big 49-36 win over San Diego State on Sunday night, Washington jumped in to the AP Top 25, appearing as the last team on the list. For a proud program under Lorenzo Romar that was once a regular fixture in those rankings, this is the first time the Huskies have been there in nearly four years (February 2011). But interestingly enough, the Huskies are not in the RTC Top 25 this week, so clearly they still have something to prove to some in the college basketball community. What gives? Why the lack of trust in a Washington team that not only has a convincing win over the nationally regarded Aztecs, but also a Wooden Legacy title under its belt? The Huskies are holding opponents to a 37.2% eFG this season, good for fourth in the nation, and they’re 38th in adjusted defensive efficiency, a mark they haven’t seen over the course of an entire season since Jon Brockman and Justin Dentmon were wearing purple and gold. These guys must be for real, right?
Don’t worry Huskies’ fans. This is not the point where you get the comedown of a “not so fast.” Fact is, there is a lot to like here. And room to get better. Those defensive numbers are probably a bit overblown, in part due to San Diego State’s inability to hit anything en route to a 22.2% eFG on Sunday night. But, with shotblocker extraordinaire Robert Upshaw manning the middle for about 20 minutes per game (his 21.4% block rate – the percent of opponent’s two-point field goal attempts he blocks while he’s on the floor – is the best in the nation), and with fellow intimidating interior presences in Jernard Jarreau and Shawn Kemp, Jr., the Huskies are going to be seriously tough to score on inside all year long. That frees up perimeter defenders to really pressure perimeter players, running them off the three-point line and forcing them into tougher and less rewarding field goal attempts. The 24.4 percent rate they are allowing from behind the three-point line thus far this season is in no way sustainable, but the strategy is.
And that strategy will pay off big time, especially in this year’s Pac-12. You look around the conference and there are big front lines everywhere. Arizona is 23rd in the nation in effective height. Stanford is 22nd. UCLA is 21st. Utah is 13th. Colorado is not small. This is a Pac-12 built around big frontcourts on the best teams, and the Huskies have the bigs to compete with the best of those. Now, all that said, this is still a team with a frontcourt that has played mostly overmatched and undersized opponents, and still is not doing a very good job in cleaning the boards. They’re grabbing just 66 percent of their opponent’s misses, good for 255th in the nation in defensive rebounding percentage, a number that often correlates highly with good shot-blocking teams that forget to block out. That could come back to haunt this group when it gets to conference play against those other big front lines.
Offensively, things are probably a little more settled; what you’ve seen so far is mostly what you’re going to get. Nigel Williams-Goss is a terrific point guard; Andrew Andrews is a ridiculously talented scorer at all three levels on the offensive end; and then there are a bunch of other decent parts. Upshaw is still wild offensively, but he certainly can get on the offensive glass and wreak havoc along with Kemp. And freshman wing Donaven Dorsey has come out of the gates nailing threes (12-of-27 thus far from deep), while senior Mike Anderson is a solid if unspectacular offensive player (aside from being an excellent and versatile perimeter defender). But this isn’t an offense that is suddenly going to turn into an elite squad. They’re about what they were last season in that regard. For the Huskies to continue to make big strides in the win/loss record, that defensive improvement, although almost certainly bound to backslide a little, is going to have to be the hallmark of these new and improved Huskies.