define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sustained success &#8211; Rush The Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/tag/sustained-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Top Recruiting Classes Produce Mixed Results: An Analysis of Recent Recruiting History</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2012/04/13/top-recruiting-classes-produce-mixed-results-an-analysis-of-recent-recruiting-history/</link>
					<comments>http://rushthecourt.net/2012/04/13/top-recruiting-classes-produce-mixed-results-an-analysis-of-recent-recruiting-history/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EJacoby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[recruiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rtc analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerlens Noel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oklahoma state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruiting history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shabazz muhammad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustained success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syracuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top recruiting classes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ucla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wake forest]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=69246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div><p>Evan Jacoby is a regular contributor for RTC. You can find him @evanjacoby on Twitter.</p>
<p>On the heels of Nerlens Noel and Shabazz Muhammad’s signings as the top two high school recruits, everyone is looking forward to next season. There’s especially great hype surrounding Kentucky, UCLA, and Arizona, the prize winners of 2012’s recruiting trail. While those fan bases should certainly be excited, we decided to conduct some research as a reminder that a top incoming recruiting class doesn’t necessarily guarantee future success. The incredible success of Kentucky’s one-and-done recruiting strategy over the past couple of years (two Final Fours, one [...]</div>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://rushthecourt.net/2012/04/13/top-recruiting-classes-produce-mixed-results-an-analysis-of-recent-recruiting-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>