define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); standard model – Rush The Court http://rushthecourt.net The Independent Voice of College Basketball Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:48:33 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9 http://rushthecourt.net http://rushthecourt.net/wp-content/mbp-favicon/RTC.jpg Rush The Court NCAA Tourney Overachievers and Underachievers of the 65 (64) Team Era http://rushthecourt.net/2007/06/15/ncaa-tourney-overachievers-and-underachievers-of-the-65-64-team-era/ http://rushthecourt.net/2007/06/15/ncaa-tourney-overachievers-and-underachievers-of-the-65-64-team-era/#comments Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:56:48 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/2007/06/15/ncaa-tourney-overachievers-and-underachievers-of-the-65-64-team-era/

We’ve received a resounding response on the post Tuesday evaluating school performance during the 65 (64) team era, so let’s waste no time in presenting Part II of our statistical profile of the NCAA Tournament during that period. As we alluded to in that post, looking at raw data in a vacuum has its limitations. From that data we got a reasonable sense of which programs have had the most success during the period, but it didn’t really give any insight as to which programs have overachieved, underachieved, or simply performed about as expected.

Which Schools Reach Their [...]]]> http://rushthecourt.net/2007/06/15/ncaa-tourney-overachievers-and-underachievers-of-the-65-64-team-era/feed/ 2