define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>metro &#8211; Rush The Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/tag/metro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>NCAA Tournament Success in the 65 (64) Team Era by Conference</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2007/07/07/ncaa-tournament-success-in-the-65-64-team-era-by-conference/</link>
					<comments>http://rushthecourt.net/2007/07/07/ncaa-tournament-success-in-the-65-64-team-era-by-conference/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rtmsf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 05:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ncaa tournament (general)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rtc analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atlantic 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gonzaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great midwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low majors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mid-majors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missouri valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountain west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncaa tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pac-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wcc]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/2007/07/07/ncaa-tournament-success-in-the-65-64-team-era-by-conference/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div><p align="justify">Hope everyone had a great 4th of July holiday&#8230; although we gotta say this midweek holiday thing kinda sucks. Give us the three-day (or four!) day weekend instead.</p>
<p align="justify">Anyway, we&#8217;re now ready to unveil the conference follow-up to our June analysis of the Top NCAA Performers of the 65 (64) Team Era. Once again, we&#8217;re going to take several different views of the world here. Today we&#8217;ll just look at the raw statistics and make some obvious insightful observations. In the next post, we&#8217;ll take a look at how conferences have performed versus its seeds during this era, and [...]</div>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://rushthecourt.net/2007/07/07/ncaa-tournament-success-in-the-65-64-team-era-by-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>