define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>college basketball power index &#8211; Rush The Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/tag/college-basketball-power-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:27:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>New ESPN BPI Rankings are Useful but Far From Groundbreaking</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2012/02/13/new-espn-bpi-rankings-are-useful-but-far-from-groundbreaking/</link>
					<comments>http://rushthecourt.net/2012/02/13/new-espn-bpi-rankings-are-useful-but-far-from-groundbreaking/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EJacoby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[rtc analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brandon triche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college basketball power index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creighton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug McDermott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jared sullinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kenpom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sagarin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syracuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tempo-free stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 25 polls]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=60801</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div><p>Evan Jacoby is a regular contributor to RTC. You can find him @evanjacoby on Twitter. </p>
<p>The Worldwide Leader is again looking to stake its claim in the advanced stat revolution, this time in the college basketball realm. Saturday was the unveiling of ESPN’s new College Basketball Power Index (BPI), which ranks all Division I teams 1-344 based on a number of factors that go beyond wins and losses. The two most obvious questions to ask of this new system are: How does the BPI compare to the KenPom and Sagarin ratings that college basketball purists have come to know so well? [...]</div>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://rushthecourt.net/2012/02/13/new-espn-bpi-rankings-are-useful-but-far-from-groundbreaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>