define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: No More Wisconsins: Is a Shortened Shot Clock Creating More Parity?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2015/12/09/no-more-wisconsins-is-a-shortened-shot-clock-creating-more-parity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2015/12/09/no-more-wisconsins-is-a-shortened-shot-clock-creating-more-parity/</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 20:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Total		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2015/12/09/no-more-wisconsins-is-a-shortened-shot-clock-creating-more-parity/comment-page-1/#comment-3249575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Total]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 20:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=113047#comment-3249575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What Matt B said.

Also, the decline in offensive efficiency deviation started in 2010 and has been going since then, making it unlikely that it is (just) the shot clock change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Matt B said.</p>
<p>Also, the decline in offensive efficiency deviation started in 2010 and has been going since then, making it unlikely that it is (just) the shot clock change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt B		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2015/12/09/no-more-wisconsins-is-a-shortened-shot-clock-creating-more-parity/comment-page-1/#comment-3249551</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 19:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=113047#comment-3249551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think you might be underestimating just how flat KenPom numbers can be to start the year. Not only are his preseason numbers, which still have some effect at this point, naturally conservative, but schedule strengths are very bunched at this time of year, which is a big deal since we are talking about adjusted efficiency instead of raw. On a similar date last season, Duke has the number one offense at 120.2 and Wisconsin was second with only 113.7. See the link below for full numbers at this time last year.

https://web.archive.org/web/20141211004214/http://kenpom.com/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you might be underestimating just how flat KenPom numbers can be to start the year. Not only are his preseason numbers, which still have some effect at this point, naturally conservative, but schedule strengths are very bunched at this time of year, which is a big deal since we are talking about adjusted efficiency instead of raw. On a similar date last season, Duke has the number one offense at 120.2 and Wisconsin was second with only 113.7. See the link below for full numbers at this time last year.</p>
<p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20141211004214/http://kenpom.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://web.archive.org/web/20141211004214/http://kenpom.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>