define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Inside the ACC Numbers: Volume V	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2015/02/20/inside-the-acc-numbers-volume-v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2015/02/20/inside-the-acc-numbers-volume-v/</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad Jenkins		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2015/02/20/inside-the-acc-numbers-volume-v/comment-page-1/#comment-2631454</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=107906#comment-2631454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Tyer. Honestly, I think the Duke number is probably skewed by some extreme performances. Clearly their two worst performances of the year were the back-to-back losses to N.C. State and Miami, which ended up as high possession games, because Duke was forcing pace to try and catch up. Conversely, two of their best games were the wins over Wisconsin and Virginia which were going to be low possession games anyway, but Duke played well in both.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tyer. Honestly, I think the Duke number is probably skewed by some extreme performances. Clearly their two worst performances of the year were the back-to-back losses to N.C. State and Miami, which ended up as high possession games, because Duke was forcing pace to try and catch up. Conversely, two of their best games were the wins over Wisconsin and Virginia which were going to be low possession games anyway, but Duke played well in both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tyer		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2015/02/20/inside-the-acc-numbers-volume-v/comment-page-1/#comment-2630469</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=107906#comment-2630469</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great post. It&#039;s really surprising to see Duke&#039;s negative tempo correlation number - why do you think that might be?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. It&#8217;s really surprising to see Duke&#8217;s negative tempo correlation number &#8211; why do you think that might be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>