define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rushed Reaction: #9 Duke 75, #2 Kentucky 68	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2012/11/14/rushed-reaction-9-duke-75-2-kentucky-68/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2012/11/14/rushed-reaction-9-duke-75-2-kentucky-68/</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: bjoyce		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2012/11/14/rushed-reaction-9-duke-75-2-kentucky-68/comment-page-1/#comment-891680</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bjoyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=79126#comment-891680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://rushthecourt.net/2012/11/14/rushed-reaction-9-duke-75-2-kentucky-68/comment-page-1/#comment-891406&quot;&gt;AMurawa&lt;/a&gt;.

Agreed. Kentucky will look completely different in March. Will help to have a starting point guard as well. Duke looked much better than I anticipated. Coach K admitted this was not a good defensive squad last year, but they certainly look the part this season. They stayed in front of Kentucky&#039;s guards and prevented penetration and took a lot away from UK&#039;s shooters (Mays and Wiltjer in particular). Both games gave us quality basketball for November.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://rushthecourt.net/2012/11/14/rushed-reaction-9-duke-75-2-kentucky-68/comment-page-1/#comment-891406">AMurawa</a>.</p>
<p>Agreed. Kentucky will look completely different in March. Will help to have a starting point guard as well. Duke looked much better than I anticipated. Coach K admitted this was not a good defensive squad last year, but they certainly look the part this season. They stayed in front of Kentucky&#8217;s guards and prevented penetration and took a lot away from UK&#8217;s shooters (Mays and Wiltjer in particular). Both games gave us quality basketball for November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AMurawa		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2012/11/14/rushed-reaction-9-duke-75-2-kentucky-68/comment-page-1/#comment-891406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AMurawa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=79126#comment-891406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good stuff. As good as Duke looked tonight, the thing is, those UK frosh have got a lot of improvement ahead of them over the next 4-5 months. Those Duke seniors likely don&#039;t have the same trajectory ahead of them. Sulaimon is gonna get better, but the Blue Devils probably need Jefferson to become a contributor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. As good as Duke looked tonight, the thing is, those UK frosh have got a lot of improvement ahead of them over the next 4-5 months. Those Duke seniors likely don&#8217;t have the same trajectory ahead of them. Sulaimon is gonna get better, but the Blue Devils probably need Jefferson to become a contributor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>