define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: Bracketology S-Curve Update: 03.10.12
http://rushthecourt.net/2012/03/10/bracketology-s-curve-update-03-10-12/
The Independent Voice of College BasketballSun, 11 Mar 2012 04:21:35 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9
By: zhayes9
http://rushthecourt.net/2012/03/10/bracketology-s-curve-update-03-10-12/comment-page-1/#comment-754661
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:02:33 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=65474#comment-754661Fixed the New Mexico problem. Moved them up to a 7 seed and just forgot to delete them from the 8 seed line.
Ron- Good call on Kentucky. They’ll go to St. Louis as the #1 overall seed. Thanks.
]]>
By: Ron
http://rushthecourt.net/2012/03/10/bracketology-s-curve-update-03-10-12/comment-page-1/#comment-754605
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:46:57 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=65474#comment-754605Wouldn’t it make more sense to have UK to St. Louis (which is closer to Lexington than ATL) and put UNC South?? Versus having two teams (West & Midwest) well away from home.
]]>
By: Antonio
http://rushthecourt.net/2012/03/10/bracketology-s-curve-update-03-10-12/comment-page-1/#comment-754195
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 16:03:22 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=65474#comment-754195You have New Mexico listed as a 7 & 8 seed.
]]>
By: Ken In Vegas
http://rushthecourt.net/2012/03/10/bracketology-s-curve-update-03-10-12/comment-page-1/#comment-754143
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:35:13 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=65474#comment-754143Looks like you have five 8-seeds and 69 teams in the tournament. Wish K-state would get off that 8-9 seeding range. Maybe the committee will be kind to them.
]]>