define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Weekly Bracketology: 03.08.10	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:04:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rtmsf		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33421</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rtmsf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=19083#comment-33421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33413&quot;&gt;matt&lt;/a&gt;.

Very much agree with this.  Winning teams know the little things to do to win games, especially close ones.  These kinds of teams cause all kinds of problems for the 20-11 teams from the BCS leagues.  Looking forward to it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33413">matt</a>.</p>
<p>Very much agree with this.  Winning teams know the little things to do to win games, especially close ones.  These kinds of teams cause all kinds of problems for the 20-11 teams from the BCS leagues.  Looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: matt		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33414</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=19083#comment-33414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I meant to say &#039;I always love.&#039;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say &#8216;I always love.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: matt		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33413</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=19083#comment-33413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I also love a tournament with strong mid-to-low major teams:
Austin Peay (30-4)
Cornell (27-4)
Northern Iowa (28-4)
Old Dominion (26-8)
Siena (27-6)

All these teams possess gaudy records if not resumes. Should make for some interesting first round matchups.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also love a tournament with strong mid-to-low major teams:<br />
Austin Peay (30-4)<br />
Cornell (27-4)<br />
Northern Iowa (28-4)<br />
Old Dominion (26-8)<br />
Siena (27-6)</p>
<p>All these teams possess gaudy records if not resumes. Should make for some interesting first round matchups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33351</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=19083#comment-33351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had Baylor a 3 seed before this weekend. It&#039;s not far fetched. They&#039;re a very good team with a profile for a great seed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had Baylor a 3 seed before this weekend. It&#8217;s not far fetched. They&#8217;re a very good team with a profile for a great seed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: zhayes9		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33344</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zhayes9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=19083#comment-33344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s the committee&#039;s job to rank these teams. Baylor gets the slight edge out of that group at this point in time. The Bears bad loss came on January 12 and they&#039;ve won 7of 8. Not like they&#039;re trending the wrong way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the committee&#8217;s job to rank these teams. Baylor gets the slight edge out of that group at this point in time. The Bears bad loss came on January 12 and they&#8217;ve won 7of 8. Not like they&#8217;re trending the wrong way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33343</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=19083#comment-33343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When you frame it that way, it will be very difficult for the committee to rank these teams.  

I think Temple is probably a better bet since they don&#039;t have any bad losses (RPI &#062;100).  All of the other teams have at least one bad loss except MSU, who is lacking in good wins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you frame it that way, it will be very difficult for the committee to rank these teams.  </p>
<p>I think Temple is probably a better bet since they don&#8217;t have any bad losses (RPI &gt;100).  All of the other teams have at least one bad loss except MSU, who is lacking in good wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: zhayes9		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33326</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zhayes9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=19083#comment-33326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why not?

Baylor: 24-6 (11-5), 8 RPI, 21 SOS, 2-3 vs. RPI 1-25, 4-1 vs. RPI 26-50, 5-1 vs. RPI 51-100

Vanderbilt: 23-7 (12-4), 20 RPI, 24 SOS, 2-2, 2-0, 8-4
Tennessee: 23-7 (11-5), 13 RPI, 23 SOS, 2-4, 1-0, 9-2
Michigan St: 24-7 (14-4), 26 RPI, 40 SOS, 2-2, 1-2, 5-3
Wisconsin: 23-7 (13-5), 18 RPI, 20 SOS, 3-1, 2-3, 4-2
Temple: 26-5 (14-2), 14 RPI, 71 SOS, 2-3, 4-0, 3-2
Texas A&#038;M: 22-8 (11-5), 12 RPI, 6 SOS, 2-5, 3-3, 4-0

I could see a case for Temple but they played in a much less difficult conference. Baylor has 2 more top-100 wins than A&#038;M and a better non-conference record. It was close but Baylor has the best resume.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not?</p>
<p>Baylor: 24-6 (11-5), 8 RPI, 21 SOS, 2-3 vs. RPI 1-25, 4-1 vs. RPI 26-50, 5-1 vs. RPI 51-100</p>
<p>Vanderbilt: 23-7 (12-4), 20 RPI, 24 SOS, 2-2, 2-0, 8-4<br />
Tennessee: 23-7 (11-5), 13 RPI, 23 SOS, 2-4, 1-0, 9-2<br />
Michigan St: 24-7 (14-4), 26 RPI, 40 SOS, 2-2, 1-2, 5-3<br />
Wisconsin: 23-7 (13-5), 18 RPI, 20 SOS, 3-1, 2-3, 4-2<br />
Temple: 26-5 (14-2), 14 RPI, 71 SOS, 2-3, 4-0, 3-2<br />
Texas A&amp;M: 22-8 (11-5), 12 RPI, 6 SOS, 2-5, 3-3, 4-0</p>
<p>I could see a case for Temple but they played in a much less difficult conference. Baylor has 2 more top-100 wins than A&amp;M and a better non-conference record. It was close but Baylor has the best resume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/03/08/weekly-bracketology-03-08-10/comment-page-1/#comment-33315</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=19083#comment-33315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Baylor as a 3 seed?  Tennessee in the Final Four?  Child please.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baylor as a 3 seed?  Tennessee in the Final Four?  Child please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>