define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Weekly Bracketology: 02.22.10	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/22/weekly-bracketology-02-22-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/22/weekly-bracketology-02-22-10/</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Hoops Junkie		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/22/weekly-bracketology-02-22-10/comment-page-1/#comment-31152</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Hoops Junkie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=18073#comment-31152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zach, nice work on the bracketology. I like the picking of the winners in the bracket too. You don&#039;t really see that on other sites. It&#039;s a nice tough.

Pitt as a 3 seed seems crazy from a talent perspective, but it&#039;s tough to argue with the earlier Syracuse win, and the last 3 against West Virginia, at Marquette, and against Villanova.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach, nice work on the bracketology. I like the picking of the winners in the bracket too. You don&#8217;t really see that on other sites. It&#8217;s a nice tough.</p>
<p>Pitt as a 3 seed seems crazy from a talent perspective, but it&#8217;s tough to argue with the earlier Syracuse win, and the last 3 against West Virginia, at Marquette, and against Villanova.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: zhayes9		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/22/weekly-bracketology-02-22-10/comment-page-1/#comment-31122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zhayes9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=18073#comment-31122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ohh, yeah, I usually always remember to check Fri/Sun thing for BYU, that&#039;s my fault. This isn&#039;t easy stuff, my friend.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohh, yeah, I usually always remember to check Fri/Sun thing for BYU, that&#8217;s my fault. This isn&#8217;t easy stuff, my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/22/weekly-bracketology-02-22-10/comment-page-1/#comment-31114</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=18073#comment-31114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just a couple of points:
- BYU would not be placed in either Spokane or St. Louis since they are both Fri/Sun sites.
- The play in winner would not play in Oklahoma City since it is a Th/Sat site.  They are required to go to a Fri/Sun site.
- New Mexico &#038; BYU would not be in the same resion since the top three teams from a conference are required to be in different regions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a couple of points:<br />
&#8211; BYU would not be placed in either Spokane or St. Louis since they are both Fri/Sun sites.<br />
&#8211; The play in winner would not play in Oklahoma City since it is a Th/Sat site.  They are required to go to a Fri/Sun site.<br />
&#8211; New Mexico &amp; BYU would not be in the same resion since the top three teams from a conference are required to be in different regions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>