define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: RTC Official Bubble Watch: 02.10.10	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/10/rtc-official-bubble-watch-02-10-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/10/rtc-official-bubble-watch-02-10-10/</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: zhayes9		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/10/rtc-official-bubble-watch-02-10-10/comment-page-1/#comment-29879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zhayes9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=17483#comment-29879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also, thank you for the compliment!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, thank you for the compliment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: zhayes9		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/10/rtc-official-bubble-watch-02-10-10/comment-page-1/#comment-29878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zhayes9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=17483#comment-29878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I mean, ehhh. I considered all of those teams and I can always add them later if they reel off a big win streak, but UTEP/Tulsa just did close to zero OOC and have low RPIs while VCU is 9-5 in the CAA and didn&#039;t match W&#038;M&#039;s non-conf wins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I mean, ehhh. I considered all of those teams and I can always add them later if they reel off a big win streak, but UTEP/Tulsa just did close to zero OOC and have low RPIs while VCU is 9-5 in the CAA and didn&#8217;t match W&amp;M&#8217;s non-conf wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/10/rtc-official-bubble-watch-02-10-10/comment-page-1/#comment-29845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=17483#comment-29845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Awesome job as usual, Zach. I like the seed range you added in this time.

I think Arizona State has to at least be considered. 16-8 (6-5) with RPI similar to Northwestern, South Carolina and Mississippi State. I don&#039;t think they&#039;d be in the field but I&#039;d give them a mention in the bubble watch.

I would disagre with UAB being the only C-USA chance for a bid. I think UTEP has an outside shot as does Tulsa. 

I think you forgot to list VCU.

Other than that I have no complaints. As comprehensive a look at the bubble as there is out there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome job as usual, Zach. I like the seed range you added in this time.</p>
<p>I think Arizona State has to at least be considered. 16-8 (6-5) with RPI similar to Northwestern, South Carolina and Mississippi State. I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;d be in the field but I&#8217;d give them a mention in the bubble watch.</p>
<p>I would disagre with UAB being the only C-USA chance for a bid. I think UTEP has an outside shot as does Tulsa. </p>
<p>I think you forgot to list VCU.</p>
<p>Other than that I have no complaints. As comprehensive a look at the bubble as there is out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>