define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: Weekly Bracketology: 02.01.10
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/
The Independent Voice of College BasketballTue, 02 Feb 2010 16:19:34 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9
By: zhayes9
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28831
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:19:34 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28831Believe me, D. King, Charlotte is extremely close. Sweep this week vs. GW and Fordham and they’ll likely be there with other bubble teams (I’m sure) losing once.
]]>
By: D. King
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28822
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:00:44 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28822Thanks for the feedback.
There’s plenty of teams with losing records against the top 25, even to that extent though. I don’t think we should penalize them for that. I do like you giving Richmond a bit more love than others out there, but I think St. Mary’s is like a Last 4 out
]]>
By: zhayes9
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28727
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:40:15 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28727I’m not quite ready to put Charlotte in the field. They don’t have the non-conf profiles of the other A-10 bubble teams (for example, Richmond beat Miss St, Missouri, ODU and Florida while Dayton has a string of close losses to elite teams). The bad losses by 30+ at Duke and GT stood out. They’re just 1-4 vs. RPI top 25 opponents. They’re close.
]]>
By: D. King
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28722
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:10:54 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28722I don’t agree with Charlotte:
3 top 50 wins(2 on the road), 1 of which a top 25 win.
0 bad lossses.
6-1 in A-10(6th overall conf.)
They got to have a spot. I’d have them in ahead of Richmond & Lville for sure
You have St. Mary’s at a 9, and a nice resume, but just 1 top 50 win. 6-1 in a crappy conference. That doesn’t compare to Charlotte.
Siena at a 9 is high. They haven’t done anything but do well in an awful conference. They wouldn’t be a .500 team in the Big East, so why give them such a high seeding?
]]>
By: Sean
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28714
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:44:19 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28714A K-State/KU rematch in Indy would be sweet
]]>
By: Charles
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28700
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:35:54 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28700You people know that Charlotte did win AT Richmond and that Rhode Island wasn’t able to beat Temple AT HOME, unlike the Charlotte 49ers. And Dayton lost to SAINT JOSEPH’S!!!!!!!!
]]>
By: RDM
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28696
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:52:57 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28696I love seeing that 5 spot next to the A10!
]]>
By: Howard
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28689
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:42:40 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28689Like Cornell at 10-deserving but not sure committee will see it that way
]]>
By: JP
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28676
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:48:56 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28676Northern Iowa over Duke in rd 2? I’ll take that bet.
]]>