define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); Comments on: Weekly Bracketology: 02.01.10 http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/ The Independent Voice of College Basketball Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:19:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9 By: zhayes9 http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28831 Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:19:34 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28831 Believe me, D. King, Charlotte is extremely close. Sweep this week vs. GW and Fordham and they’ll likely be there with other bubble teams (I’m sure) losing once.

]]>
By: D. King http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28822 Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:00:44 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28822 Thanks for the feedback.

There’s plenty of teams with losing records against the top 25, even to that extent though. I don’t think we should penalize them for that. I do like you giving Richmond a bit more love than others out there, but I think St. Mary’s is like a Last 4 out

]]>
By: zhayes9 http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28727 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:40:15 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28727 I’m not quite ready to put Charlotte in the field. They don’t have the non-conf profiles of the other A-10 bubble teams (for example, Richmond beat Miss St, Missouri, ODU and Florida while Dayton has a string of close losses to elite teams). The bad losses by 30+ at Duke and GT stood out. They’re just 1-4 vs. RPI top 25 opponents. They’re close.

]]>
By: D. King http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28722 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:10:54 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28722 I don’t agree with Charlotte:
3 top 50 wins(2 on the road), 1 of which a top 25 win.
0 bad lossses.
6-1 in A-10(6th overall conf.)

They got to have a spot. I’d have them in ahead of Richmond & Lville for sure

You have St. Mary’s at a 9, and a nice resume, but just 1 top 50 win. 6-1 in a crappy conference. That doesn’t compare to Charlotte.

Siena at a 9 is high. They haven’t done anything but do well in an awful conference. They wouldn’t be a .500 team in the Big East, so why give them such a high seeding?

]]>
By: Sean http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28714 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:44:19 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28714 A K-State/KU rematch in Indy would be sweet

]]>
By: Charles http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28700 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:35:54 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28700 You people know that Charlotte did win AT Richmond and that Rhode Island wasn’t able to beat Temple AT HOME, unlike the Charlotte 49ers. And Dayton lost to SAINT JOSEPH’S!!!!!!!!

]]>
By: RDM http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28696 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:52:57 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28696 I love seeing that 5 spot next to the A10!

]]>
By: Howard http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28689 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:42:40 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28689 Like Cornell at 10-deserving but not sure committee will see it that way

]]>
By: JP http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/weekly-bracketology-02-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28676 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:48:56 +0000 http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16924#comment-28676 Northern Iowa over Duke in rd 2? I’ll take that bet.

]]>