define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: March Madness…And April Anxiety?
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/march-madness-and-april-anxiety/
The Independent Voice of College BasketballFri, 12 Feb 2010 22:09:14 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9
By: Printable NCAA Bracket
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/march-madness-and-april-anxiety/comment-page-1/#comment-29996
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:09:14 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16948#comment-29996Kansas JayHawks are definitely winning this March Madness. Ill bet the farm. They have improved so well since last season. this is their year!
]]>
By: Howard
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/march-madness-and-april-anxiety/comment-page-1/#comment-28935
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:22:27 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16948#comment-28935Great idea !!!
]]>
By: rtmsf
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/march-madness-and-april-anxiety/comment-page-1/#comment-28859
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:07:51 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16948#comment-28859In reply to Howard.
I’ve long been a proponent that any expansion should be to 68 to balance out the play-in games. My only complaint is that the NCAA is intent on making it the worst teams via RPI and computer rankings as opposed to the last bubble teams (which would probably get much higher ratings). Let the conf champs have their day in the “real” tourney and force the #12 and #13 seeds from the SEC and Big East to win another game!
]]>
By: Howard
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/march-madness-and-april-anxiety/comment-page-1/#comment-28857
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:59:26 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16948#comment-28857Correction-meant a play -in game in each Bracket not venue
]]>
By: Howard
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/march-madness-and-april-anxiety/comment-page-1/#comment-28856
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:57:28 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16948#comment-28856Expansion to 68 makes sense– a play-in game at EACH venue. As for netowrk, those of you old enough to remember know that ESPN did a much better job than CBS–no talking heads or commercials during important game action etc.
]]>
By: Charles Seymour Jr
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/march-madness-and-april-anxiety/comment-page-1/#comment-410111
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:23:59 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16948#comment-410111Rush The Court » Blog Archive » March Madness…And April Anxiety? http://bit.ly/9CiXPA
]]>
By: G. Floyd
http://rushthecourt.net/2010/02/01/march-madness-and-april-anxiety/comment-page-1/#comment-28830
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:11:29 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=16948#comment-2883064. It should be 64 (not 65) and leave it alone. The 64 team field has found a median between Cinderella and Power Houses. By upgrading the tournament to 96 you let in more teams that don’t have a legitimate shot to win a National Championship. Yes, you would have extra bonus of a small school upsetting a mediocre BCS school but what joy does the public recieve watching a good CAA team get from beating a bottom shelf Big Ten team. I am begging the NCAA to not ruin one of the greatest times of the year. You have a perfect formula, stick with it.
]]>