define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: RTC Top 25: Week 5	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2009/12/07/rtc-top-25-week-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/12/07/rtc-top-25-week-5/</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:30:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/12/07/rtc-top-25-week-5/comment-page-1/#comment-23698</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=13705#comment-23698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s what I&#039;ve got by the way:

. Kansas 7-0 (1)
2. Texas 6-0 (2)
3. Kentucky 8-0 (4)
4. Villanova 8-0 (5)
5. Purdue 7-0 (6)
6. West Virginia 5-0 (7)
7. Tennessee 6-1 (8)
8. Syracuse 8-0 (9)
9. Duke 7-1 (3)
10. Florida 8-0 (18)
11. North Carolina 7-2 (14)
12. Ohio State 7-1 (12)
13. Michigan State 6-2 (10)
14. Cincinnati 5-1 (15)
15. Washington 6-1 (11)
16. Clemson 7-2 (16)
17. Connecticut 6-1 (17)
18. Texas A&#038;M 7-1 (19)
19. Gonzaga 6-2 (13)
20. UNLV 7-0 (NR)
21. Kansas State 7-1 (NR)
22. Butler 6-2 (25)
23. Mississippi 7-1 (20)
24. Georgia Tech 6-1 (NR)
25. Memphis 5-1 (24)

New Additions: UNLV, Kansas State, Georgia Tech.
Dropped Out: #21 Louisville, #22 Michigan, #23 Minnesota.
Also Considered: Wisconsin, Texas Tech, New Mexico, Vanderbilt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve got by the way:</p>
<p>. Kansas 7-0 (1)<br />
2. Texas 6-0 (2)<br />
3. Kentucky 8-0 (4)<br />
4. Villanova 8-0 (5)<br />
5. Purdue 7-0 (6)<br />
6. West Virginia 5-0 (7)<br />
7. Tennessee 6-1 (8)<br />
8. Syracuse 8-0 (9)<br />
9. Duke 7-1 (3)<br />
10. Florida 8-0 (18)<br />
11. North Carolina 7-2 (14)<br />
12. Ohio State 7-1 (12)<br />
13. Michigan State 6-2 (10)<br />
14. Cincinnati 5-1 (15)<br />
15. Washington 6-1 (11)<br />
16. Clemson 7-2 (16)<br />
17. Connecticut 6-1 (17)<br />
18. Texas A&amp;M 7-1 (19)<br />
19. Gonzaga 6-2 (13)<br />
20. UNLV 7-0 (NR)<br />
21. Kansas State 7-1 (NR)<br />
22. Butler 6-2 (25)<br />
23. Mississippi 7-1 (20)<br />
24. Georgia Tech 6-1 (NR)<br />
25. Memphis 5-1 (24)</p>
<p>New Additions: UNLV, Kansas State, Georgia Tech.<br />
Dropped Out: #21 Louisville, #22 Michigan, #23 Minnesota.<br />
Also Considered: Wisconsin, Texas Tech, New Mexico, Vanderbilt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/12/07/rtc-top-25-week-5/comment-page-1/#comment-23696</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=13705#comment-23696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can not believe St. John&#039;s got votes, just like in the national polls. What do you guys see that I do not? (Serious question)

I do believe they&#039;re a sleeper in the Big East but they&#039;ve yet to prove it. Maybe it&#039;s because I don&#039;t think highly of Siena at all and I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s why people are regarding St. John&#039;s as pretty good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can not believe St. John&#8217;s got votes, just like in the national polls. What do you guys see that I do not? (Serious question)</p>
<p>I do believe they&#8217;re a sleeper in the Big East but they&#8217;ve yet to prove it. Maybe it&#8217;s because I don&#8217;t think highly of Siena at all and I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s why people are regarding St. John&#8217;s as pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>