<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Floriani at the Preseason NIT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2009/11/26/floriani/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/11/26/floriani/</link>
	<description>the ubiquitous college basketblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:28:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jtruman37</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/11/26/floriani/comment-page-1/#comment-22316</link>
		<dc:creator>jtruman37</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=13208#comment-22316</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m nervous for this match up.  The Duke/UConn game, I mean.  Well, nervous isn&#039;t the right word.  I&#039;m anxious anytime the Huskies play Duke.  It&#039;s not a game I particularly care to see my team lose.  &amp; I&#039;ve enjoyed the run.  I want to say UConn has won the last 3 or 4 games against the Devils, including some big ones.  

If this game were played in January, or later, I would be more confident than I am now.  It doesn&#039;t all have to do w/ the absence of Ater Majok, but that is a big piece of the puzzle missing.  &amp; I&#039;m sure the Dukies are equally bummed to be missing the injured Plumlee (whichever one that is).  This year&#039;s UConn team is odd.  They have some experience, in key positions, but they also have a lot of youth.  The youth is in the frontcourt, &amp; that is not where you want it.  Gavin Edwards has been a role player more than the factor he was last night.  Hopefully he&#039;s taking the sort of step forward that Hilton Armstrong did, between his junior &amp; senior seasons.  @ least, hopefully he&#039;ll be a consistent factor.  

My point is that this UConn team, w/ a season&#039;s maturity under their belts, &amp; w/ Majok, will be a tough out.  &amp; that the team that plays Duke tomorrow, &amp; Kentucky on Dec 9, will be better, if the teams were to meet again, in March.  The same is true for every team, to an extent.  &amp; still, it will be an interesting match up tomorrow.  This Husky team is smaller than &amp; less experienced, up front, than we&#039;ve been accustomed to.  But they are FAST, &amp; athletic.  &amp; they play a lot of D&#039;.  

Conversely, this Duke team is bigger than we&#039;ve been accustomed to, from them.  &amp; has some pretty good experience from it&#039;s core players.  I don&#039;t see an abundance of ball handlers, &amp; maybe that could be a facet the Huskies would look to exploit.  Scheyer seems to handle the ball a lot, &amp; I imagine Smith.  The Huskies have been running a fair amount of full court, so far, this season.  I don&#039;t expect the Devils to be as bothered by the press as the Tigers were last night, but the prowess of the Husky perimeter D&#039; has been undervalued ever since Dyson showed up on campus.  Blocks are thesexy statistic, but Dyson is a stud, &amp; Walker &amp; Robinson are both great perimeter defenders.  I think they will give Duke some trouble.

UConn is helped by Duke not shooting the lights out.  I hate to say this game comes down to rebounding, all games do.  But, in particular, this game will be decided on the boards.  UConn&#039;s defense, &amp; speed &amp; athleticism offensively, will be difficult for Duke to contend w/.  &amp; Duke&#039;s defense, &amp; offensive execution, &amp; size (we&#039;ll see), are the things the Huskies will need to endure/disrupt.  That leaves the boards, turnovers, &amp; the FT line.  FT&#039;s could also be a telling point.  Both teams usually shoot a good amount more than their opponents, so we&#039;ll see there.         

Bottom line, I wish it were a big game against anyone accept Duke.  My sporting blood has enjoyed the mastery, of Coach K, that Calhoun has enjoyed.  I think the Huskies could end up losing a game before long (unless they replicate last&#039;s night&#039;s effort), &amp; I&#039;d hate for it to be this one.  I&#039;ll stop short of saying good luck to the Blue Devils, tomorrow, but I will say Happy Thanksgiving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m nervous for this match up.  The Duke/UConn game, I mean.  Well, nervous isn&#8217;t the right word.  I&#8217;m anxious anytime the Huskies play Duke.  It&#8217;s not a game I particularly care to see my team lose.  &amp; I&#8217;ve enjoyed the run.  I want to say UConn has won the last 3 or 4 games against the Devils, including some big ones.  </p>
<p>If this game were played in January, or later, I would be more confident than I am now.  It doesn&#8217;t all have to do w/ the absence of Ater Majok, but that is a big piece of the puzzle missing.  &amp; I&#8217;m sure the Dukies are equally bummed to be missing the injured Plumlee (whichever one that is).  This year&#8217;s UConn team is odd.  They have some experience, in key positions, but they also have a lot of youth.  The youth is in the frontcourt, &amp; that is not where you want it.  Gavin Edwards has been a role player more than the factor he was last night.  Hopefully he&#8217;s taking the sort of step forward that Hilton Armstrong did, between his junior &amp; senior seasons.  @ least, hopefully he&#8217;ll be a consistent factor.  </p>
<p>My point is that this UConn team, w/ a season&#8217;s maturity under their belts, &amp; w/ Majok, will be a tough out.  &amp; that the team that plays Duke tomorrow, &amp; Kentucky on Dec 9, will be better, if the teams were to meet again, in March.  The same is true for every team, to an extent.  &amp; still, it will be an interesting match up tomorrow.  This Husky team is smaller than &amp; less experienced, up front, than we&#8217;ve been accustomed to.  But they are FAST, &amp; athletic.  &amp; they play a lot of D&#8217;.  </p>
<p>Conversely, this Duke team is bigger than we&#8217;ve been accustomed to, from them.  &amp; has some pretty good experience from it&#8217;s core players.  I don&#8217;t see an abundance of ball handlers, &amp; maybe that could be a facet the Huskies would look to exploit.  Scheyer seems to handle the ball a lot, &amp; I imagine Smith.  The Huskies have been running a fair amount of full court, so far, this season.  I don&#8217;t expect the Devils to be as bothered by the press as the Tigers were last night, but the prowess of the Husky perimeter D&#8217; has been undervalued ever since Dyson showed up on campus.  Blocks are thesexy statistic, but Dyson is a stud, &amp; Walker &amp; Robinson are both great perimeter defenders.  I think they will give Duke some trouble.</p>
<p>UConn is helped by Duke not shooting the lights out.  I hate to say this game comes down to rebounding, all games do.  But, in particular, this game will be decided on the boards.  UConn&#8217;s defense, &amp; speed &amp; athleticism offensively, will be difficult for Duke to contend w/.  &amp; Duke&#8217;s defense, &amp; offensive execution, &amp; size (we&#8217;ll see), are the things the Huskies will need to endure/disrupt.  That leaves the boards, turnovers, &amp; the FT line.  FT&#8217;s could also be a telling point.  Both teams usually shoot a good amount more than their opponents, so we&#8217;ll see there.         </p>
<p>Bottom line, I wish it were a big game against anyone accept Duke.  My sporting blood has enjoyed the mastery, of Coach K, that Calhoun has enjoyed.  I think the Huskies could end up losing a game before long (unless they replicate last&#8217;s night&#8217;s effort), &amp; I&#8217;d hate for it to be this one.  I&#8217;ll stop short of saying good luck to the Blue Devils, tomorrow, but I will say Happy Thanksgiving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
