Comments on: 2009-10 Conference Primers: #14 – West Coast

By: rtmsf

rtmsf — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:13:11 +0000

You are of course correct. Adjusted the #s accordingly. Thanks for the insight.

By: JoshComfort

JoshComfort — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:49:14 +0000

Good read and good analysis, but gotta work on those predicted records… the total number of wins and losses should be equal.

By: ZagFan

ZagFan — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:29:40 +0000

OK… 1st… Don’t see the Zags dropping 4 in conference… even in a down year. Second… what happened to USF and the Lions? Why do they get to only play 12 games? ;-)

Portland, however, is the real deal. Hope they kick the Fuskies’ butts early in the season… which, IMHO, should be listed as opposed to the underachieving Oregon game.

By: Bronco 66

Bronco 66 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:26:54 +0000

Nice writeup …. FYI add to your NCAA Tournament History. Santa Clara in the late 60’s with a sweet-16 three-peat, back to back elite-eights and the #2 ranking in the West …

By: P

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:23:24 +0000

Really a great read. Thanks.

There should be a lot of intra-conference damage this year, so here’s hoping teams do well with their OOC schedules so the losses don’t sting so much.

I think SMC will barely beat Portland through the door left open by GU and get Bennett his first conference championship. I also think USD will be in the picture late. Grier is a fantastic coach.

By: Sunshine Mel

Sunshine Mel — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:03:05 +0000

Portland??! Really?

I think USF will surprise some people. They haven’t been given much consideration so far this year!

By: Jack

Jack — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:46:27 +0000

No final thoughts?