define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: Weekly Bracketology: 03.02.09 Edition
http://rushthecourt.net/2009/03/02/weekly-bracketology-030209-edition/
The Independent Voice of College BasketballFri, 26 Jun 2009 21:18:29 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9
By: Zach
http://rushthecourt.net/2009/03/02/weekly-bracketology-030209-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2330
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:42:03 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=5612#comment-2330I love it meaning I love watching the Big Ten. One of my favorite conferences.
]]>
By: Zach
http://rushthecourt.net/2009/03/02/weekly-bracketology-030209-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2329
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:41:29 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=5612#comment-2329People really love to hate on hard-nosed, defensive-minded Big Ten basketball. I love it. And it’s not like Michigan State is Illinois or Wisconsin, either. They have tons of talent and would be a great Final Four team.
]]>
By: SSReporters
http://rushthecourt.net/2009/03/02/weekly-bracketology-030209-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2322
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:32:31 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=5612#comment-2322I’d shudder at the thought of a Big Ten team boring me to tears and making it to the Final Four.
I really don’t see anything that tells me Michigan State will make it that deep. I’d put my money on Louisville making a good run though.
]]>
By: scott
http://rushthecourt.net/2009/03/02/weekly-bracketology-030209-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2311
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:16:35 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=5612#comment-2311no villanova in the final four this week?
]]>
By: Zach
http://rushthecourt.net/2009/03/02/weekly-bracketology-030209-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2306
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:34:09 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=5612#comment-2306Lunardi should be fired for his performance today.
]]>
By: Zach
http://rushthecourt.net/2009/03/02/weekly-bracketology-030209-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2294
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:28:55 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=5612#comment-2294Matt- That’s a scheduling quirk I wasn’t aware of, and since I’m not a committee member (waiting for the invite), I can’t tell you for sure if they look that deep when deciding the #1 seeds. If it comes down to, say, Pitt and Louisville for the final #1 seed and Louisville edged them in the regular season standings-wise (as it looks like they will), the easier schedule could be a factor in preventing them from passing Pitt. It should be, IMO. Pitt has played at UConn, Louisville and Providence. This will probably end up resolving itself in the BET.
]]>
By: Tommy
http://rushthecourt.net/2009/03/02/weekly-bracketology-030209-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2286
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:49:27 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=5612#comment-2286Gawd would I love that 7-10 matchup for UMD. The Terps could get revenge from the second round game two years ago by beating the vastly overrated Bulldogs.
FEAR THE TURTLE
]]>
By: Matt
http://rushthecourt.net/2009/03/02/weekly-bracketology-030209-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2280
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:52:11 +0000http://rushthecourt.net/?p=5612#comment-2280Zach,
You mention Louisville as a possible #1 seed? How does the committee take into account the unbalanced schedule in the Big East? Louisville may very well win the Big East without having to go on the road against 4 of the other top 5 teams in the current standings (#1 UConn, #3 Pitt, #4 Marquette, #6 Providence). That would be like North Carolina not having to go to Duke, Wake Forest, and Clemson, or Michigan State not having to travel to Purdue, Illinois, or Ohio State.