<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bracketology: Never Too Early Edition IV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2009/01/11/bracketology-never-too-early-edition-iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/01/11/bracketology-never-too-early-edition-iv/</link>
	<description>the ubiquitous college basketblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:51:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wyatt</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/01/11/bracketology-never-too-early-edition-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>wyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=3637#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>Cal ahead of UCLA because it took them 3OT to beat a team UCLA would beat by 15?   Everyone&#039;s writing off the Bruins because they lost one fluke and one quality game in non-con play, but they&#039;ll go 16-2 in conference and be a 2 seed.  Their freshmen are making statements and another Final four is in the cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal ahead of UCLA because it took them 3OT to beat a team UCLA would beat by 15?   Everyone&#8217;s writing off the Bruins because they lost one fluke and one quality game in non-con play, but they&#8217;ll go 16-2 in conference and be a 2 seed.  Their freshmen are making statements and another Final four is in the cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/01/11/bracketology-never-too-early-edition-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=3637#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>GBBound- Believe me, I was thisclose to giving the Spartans that final 2 seed over the Orange. In the end, it&#039;s probably likely that the Big 10 champs (underrated conference) will get the last 2 over the 3rd place team in the Big East. Bottom line, though: Cuse has 1 loss on a halfcourt buzzer beater, while Michigan State has 2 losses (neither were particularly competitive, either). I definitely see your point, though, and those numbers back it up.

Brian- I don&#039;t have the numbers in front of me, but I do recall ND has a very poor RPI/SOS and that bad loss to St. John&#039;s. Stanford, Kentucky, A&amp;M and Oklahoma State are all lacking quality wins so we should find out more and more about them as conference season rolls on. Florida State&#039;s wins over Cal and Florida are enough to push them in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GBBound- Believe me, I was thisclose to giving the Spartans that final 2 seed over the Orange. In the end, it&#8217;s probably likely that the Big 10 champs (underrated conference) will get the last 2 over the 3rd place team in the Big East. Bottom line, though: Cuse has 1 loss on a halfcourt buzzer beater, while Michigan State has 2 losses (neither were particularly competitive, either). I definitely see your point, though, and those numbers back it up.</p>
<p>Brian- I don&#8217;t have the numbers in front of me, but I do recall ND has a very poor RPI/SOS and that bad loss to St. John&#8217;s. Stanford, Kentucky, A&amp;M and Oklahoma State are all lacking quality wins so we should find out more and more about them as conference season rolls on. Florida State&#8217;s wins over Cal and Florida are enough to push them in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/01/11/bracketology-never-too-early-edition-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=3637#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>I think Notre Dame has a case for a 4 seed over a team like Baylor or Minnesota. I think Kentucky and maybe Stanford should be in over FSU or the two Big 12 teams (A&amp;M/OSU).

Other than that this is a really good bracket. Hard to argue with anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Notre Dame has a case for a 4 seed over a team like Baylor or Minnesota. I think Kentucky and maybe Stanford should be in over FSU or the two Big 12 teams (A&amp;M/OSU).</p>
<p>Other than that this is a really good bracket. Hard to argue with anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GBBound</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2009/01/11/bracketology-never-too-early-edition-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>GBBound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=3637#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Good stuff.  While I see you have MSU advancing to the Final Four, why is Syracuse a 2 seed over MSU?  MSU has a higher RPI (4) than Syracuse (12), a much stronger SOS (12 v. 52), and 2 more RPI top 25 wins (3 v. 1) and 2 more RPI top 50 wins (5 v. 3).  MSU lost both games without Suton in the lineup, while Syracuse lost a game at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff.  While I see you have MSU advancing to the Final Four, why is Syracuse a 2 seed over MSU?  MSU has a higher RPI (4) than Syracuse (12), a much stronger SOS (12 v. 52), and 2 more RPI top 25 wins (3 v. 1) and 2 more RPI top 50 wins (5 v. 3).  MSU lost both games without Suton in the lineup, while Syracuse lost a game at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
