<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008-09 Quarterly Report &#8211; Q1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/</link>
	<description>the ubiquitous college basketblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:59:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2008-09 Quarterly Report - Midseason &#171; Rush the Court</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/comment-page-1/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>2008-09 Quarterly Report - Midseason &#171; Rush the Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2828#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>[...] is Not Unbeatable, but Are the Heels Still the Favorite? A mere month ago we wrote that North Carolina was playing like  a team with plans to lose no more than a couple of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is Not Unbeatable, but Are the Heels Still the Favorite? A mere month ago we wrote that North Carolina was playing like  a team with plans to lose no more than a couple of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtmsf</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>rtmsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2828#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>JD - nitpick, much?  To us it&#039;s more impressive to have four teams undefeated, all of whom, btw, were part of the original Big East.  We seriously doubt that if you added four teams to the ACC you&#039;d end up with another unbeaten team.  All of this misses the bigger point, though, which is that the Big East is the strongest conference in America this year through its top half, and quite possibly, from top-to-bottom.  Only time will tell on the second assertion, but we already know the answer to the first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD &#8211; nitpick, much?  To us it&#8217;s more impressive to have four teams undefeated, all of whom, btw, were part of the original Big East.  We seriously doubt that if you added four teams to the ACC you&#8217;d end up with another unbeaten team.  All of this misses the bigger point, though, which is that the Big East is the strongest conference in America this year through its top half, and quite possibly, from top-to-bottom.  Only time will tell on the second assertion, but we already know the answer to the first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2828#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>You mention the Big East having a quarter of its teams undefeated at this point but fail to say that the ACC also has three of its 12 teams in the same position.  The ACC is not worse than the Big East this year (or ever) just because it has four less teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention the Big East having a quarter of its teams undefeated at this point but fail to say that the ACC also has three of its 12 teams in the same position.  The ACC is not worse than the Big East this year (or ever) just because it has four less teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DN</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>DN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2828#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>LSU is also unbeaten (I won&#039;t pretend like they&#039;ve played stiff competition so far, but still). If they can play as well during the meat of their schedule as they have so far this year, Trent Johnson will have to be a COY candidate as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LSU is also unbeaten (I won&#8217;t pretend like they&#8217;ve played stiff competition so far, but still). If they can play as well during the meat of their schedule as they have so far this year, Trent Johnson will have to be a COY candidate as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colby</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2828#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Tar Heels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tar Heels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyb</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>andyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2828#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>just so you know, Tar Heels is two words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just so you know, Tar Heels is two words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtmsf</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>rtmsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2828#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>Matt, he&#039;s definitely on the short list, but we thought Curry, Samuels and Evans were slightly ahead of Monroe at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, he&#8217;s definitely on the short list, but we thought Curry, Samuels and Evans were slightly ahead of Monroe at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/12/08/2008-09-quarterly-report-q1/comment-page-1/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2828#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>not sure if u had him in mind but i think Greg Monroe is missing for pot candidates for FOY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure if u had him in mind but i think Greg Monroe is missing for pot candidates for FOY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
