<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Little Preseason Bracketology&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/</link>
	<description>the ubiquitous college basketblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:53:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Set Your Tivos: 01.12.09 &#38; 01.13.09 &#171; Rush the Court</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Set Your Tivos: 01.12.09 &#38; 01.13.09 &#171; Rush the Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>[...] and hope that McAlarney doesn&#8217;t go off. We keep waiting for Louisville to play to their &#8220;potential&#8221;. Will this be the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and hope that McAlarney doesn&#8217;t go off. We keep waiting for Louisville to play to their &#8220;potential&#8221;. Will this be the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATB: weekend wrap &#171; Rush the Court</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>ATB: weekend wrap &#171; Rush the Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>[...] Morehead St. 41; Louisville 81, S. Alabama 54. Samardo Samuels was the clincher as to why we chose Louisville to win the national title over UNC next April, and if his first weekend of games is any indication, we might start patting ourselves [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morehead St. 41; Louisville 81, S. Alabama 54. Samardo Samuels was the clincher as to why we chose Louisville to win the national title over UNC next April, and if his first weekend of games is any indication, we might start patting ourselves [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preseason Blogpoll Released &#171; Rush the Court</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Preseason Blogpoll Released &#171; Rush the Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>[...] everyone&#8217;s #1 team, including ours, and even though we chose Louisville to win it all in our bracket post earlier this week.  Does that make us inconsistent?  Wishy-washy?  A flip-flopper?  Nah.  UNC is the best team [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] everyone&#8217;s #1 team, including ours, and even though we chose Louisville to win it all in our bracket post earlier this week.  Does that make us inconsistent?  Wishy-washy?  A flip-flopper?  Nah.  UNC is the best team [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtmsf</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>rtmsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>David, thanks for your comments.  If we had done this bracket all at once (rather than working our way up over the course of a month), we agree that Siena would have had a better seed.

We like Purdue too, actually, but this year&#039;s MSU team has the look of a classic Izzo squad to us.  We&#039;ll see though (actually we won&#039;t see b/c we don&#039;t get the BTN).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, thanks for your comments.  If we had done this bracket all at once (rather than working our way up over the course of a month), we agree that Siena would have had a better seed.</p>
<p>We like Purdue too, actually, but this year&#8217;s MSU team has the look of a classic Izzo squad to us.  We&#8217;ll see though (actually we won&#8217;t see b/c we don&#8217;t get the BTN).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>Good bracket. I try to avoid criticizing preseason brackets, but I&#039;ll just leave my two cents.

1) Siena will be a better seed- They were a 13 last year, and return all five starters. I expect them to be an 11 when it&#039;s all said and done this season.

2) Another Villanova-Clemson 1st round game would be fun, but this time around the seeds are reversed and there won&#039;t be an upset.

3) I think Purdue will come out on top in the Big 10 over Michigan State. They have the experience and talent to win the Big 10 and get a top seed... but I think they could easily be knocked out early.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good bracket. I try to avoid criticizing preseason brackets, but I&#8217;ll just leave my two cents.</p>
<p>1) Siena will be a better seed- They were a 13 last year, and return all five starters. I expect them to be an 11 when it&#8217;s all said and done this season.</p>
<p>2) Another Villanova-Clemson 1st round game would be fun, but this time around the seeds are reversed and there won&#8217;t be an upset.</p>
<p>3) I think Purdue will come out on top in the Big 10 over Michigan State. They have the experience and talent to win the Big 10 and get a top seed&#8230; but I think they could easily be knocked out early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Time&#8230; &#171; Hell in the Hall - Louisville Sports Blog</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Time&#8230; &#171; Hell in the Hall - Louisville Sports Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>[...] http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/" rel="nofollow">http://rushthecourt.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtmsf</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>rtmsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s an actual rule, is it?  Can anyone confirm that&#039;s a rule or a preference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s an actual rule, is it?  Can anyone confirm that&#8217;s a rule or a preference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>Texas and Wisconsin play in the regular season, so they can&#039;t play in the 2nd round, right? Good bracket though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas and Wisconsin play in the regular season, so they can&#8217;t play in the 2nd round, right? Good bracket though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
