define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Little Preseason Bracketology&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/</link>
	<description>The Independent Voice of College Basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:46:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rtmsf		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rtmsf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[David, thanks for your comments.  If we had done this bracket all at once (rather than working our way up over the course of a month), we agree that Siena would have had a better seed.

We like Purdue too, actually, but this year&#039;s MSU team has the look of a classic Izzo squad to us.  We&#039;ll see though (actually we won&#039;t see b/c we don&#039;t get the BTN).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, thanks for your comments.  If we had done this bracket all at once (rather than working our way up over the course of a month), we agree that Siena would have had a better seed.</p>
<p>We like Purdue too, actually, but this year&#8217;s MSU team has the look of a classic Izzo squad to us.  We&#8217;ll see though (actually we won&#8217;t see b/c we don&#8217;t get the BTN).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good bracket. I try to avoid criticizing preseason brackets, but I&#039;ll just leave my two cents.

1) Siena will be a better seed- They were a 13 last year, and return all five starters. I expect them to be an 11 when it&#039;s all said and done this season.

2) Another Villanova-Clemson 1st round game would be fun, but this time around the seeds are reversed and there won&#039;t be an upset.

3) I think Purdue will come out on top in the Big 10 over Michigan State. They have the experience and talent to win the Big 10 and get a top seed... but I think they could easily be knocked out early.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good bracket. I try to avoid criticizing preseason brackets, but I&#8217;ll just leave my two cents.</p>
<p>1) Siena will be a better seed- They were a 13 last year, and return all five starters. I expect them to be an 11 when it&#8217;s all said and done this season.</p>
<p>2) Another Villanova-Clemson 1st round game would be fun, but this time around the seeds are reversed and there won&#8217;t be an upset.</p>
<p>3) I think Purdue will come out on top in the Big 10 over Michigan State. They have the experience and talent to win the Big 10 and get a top seed&#8230; but I think they could easily be knocked out early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rtmsf		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rtmsf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s an actual rule, is it?  Can anyone confirm that&#039;s a rule or a preference?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s an actual rule, is it?  Can anyone confirm that&#8217;s a rule or a preference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brendan		</title>
		<link>http://rushthecourt.net/2008/11/10/a-little-preseason-bracketology/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushthecourt.net/?p=2173#comment-1038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Texas and Wisconsin play in the regular season, so they can&#039;t play in the 2nd round, right? Good bracket though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas and Wisconsin play in the regular season, so they can&#8217;t play in the 2nd round, right? Good bracket though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>